 |
Epidemiological Study (case-control study)Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. epidemiol. By: INTERPHONE Study Group, Cardis E, Deltour I, Vrijheid M, Evrard AS, Moissonnier M, Amstrong B, Brown J, Giles G, Siemiatycki J, Nadon L, Parent MR, Krewski D, McBride MM, Johansen C, Christensen HC, Auvinen A, Kurttio P, Lahkola A, Salminen T, Hours M, Bernard M, Montestruq L, Schüz J, Blettner M, Berg-Beckhoff G, Schlehofer B, Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, Lagorio S, Iavarone I, Takebayashi T, Yamaguchi N, Woodward A, Cook A, Pearce N, Tynes T, Klaeboe L, Blaasaas KG, Feychting M, Lönn S, Ahlbom A, McKinney PA, Hepworth SJ, Muir KR, Swerdlow AJ, Schoenmaker MJ Published in: Cancer Epidemiol 2011; 35 (5): 453 - 464 ( PubMed Entry , Journal web site )Aim of study (according to author) An international case-control study (INTERPHONE) was conducted in 13 countries to determine whether mobile phone use increases the risk of brain tumors. Background/further details: The INTERPHONE study was initiated as an international set of case-control studies conducted in 13 countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden and the UK) focussing on four types of tumors (glioma, meningioma, acoustic neurinoma, and parotid gland tumor) in tissues that most absorb radiofrequency energy emitted by mobile phones. In the present publication the results of the analysis of the acoustic neuroma risk are presented, an earlier publication 18215 covers the results for the risk of glioma and meningioma.
Sensitivity analyses were performed to detect potential sources for bias.
Regular use of a mobile phone was defined as at least once a week for at least six months. Endpoint/type of risk estimation Estimate of incidence by odds ratio (OR)
Exposure - mobile phone, personal exposure
- type of exposure: personal
- assessment by questionnaire (mobile phone use, including start and end dates of use, frequency and laterality of use, type of phone, use of hands-free devices, and other factors, such as type of telephone network)
- assessment by interview (face-to-face interview with the study subject or a proxy or telephone interview)
- assessment by calculation (lifetime cumulative numbers of hours of phone use and numbers of calls)
groups of exposure:
| Reference group 1: | regular use: no | | group 2: | regular use: yes | | Reference group 3: | never regular use | | group 4: | time since start of use: 1-1.9 years | | group 5: | time since start of use: 2-4 years | | group 6: | time since start of use: 5-9 years | | group 7: | time since start of use: ≥ 10 years | | Reference group 8: | never regular use | | group 9: | cumulative call time: < 5 h | | group 10: | cumulative call time: 5-12.9 h | | group 11: | cumulative call time: 13-30.9 h | | group 12: | cumulative call time: 31-60.9 h | | group 13: | cumulative call time: 61-114.9 h | | group 14: | cumulative call time: 115-199.9 h | | group 15: | cumulative call time: 200-359.9 h | | group 16: | cumulative call time: 360-734.9 h | | group 17: | cumulative call time: 735-1639.9 h | | group 18: | cumulative call time: ≥ 1640 h | | Reference group 19: | never regular use | | group 20: | cumulative number of calls: < 150 | | group 21: | cumulative number of calls: 150-349 | | group 22: | cumulative number of calls: 350-749 | | group 23: | cumulative number of calls: 750-1.399 | | group 24: | cumulative number of calls: 1,400-2,549 | | group 25: | cumulative number of calls: 2,550-4,149 | | group 26: | cumulative number of calls: 4,150-6,799 | | group 27: | umulative number of calls: 6,800-12,799 | | group 28: | cumulative number of calls: 12,800-26,999 | | group 29: | cumulative number of calls: ≥ 27,000 | | Reference group 30: | no ipsilateral mobile phone use | | group 31: | ipsilateral mobile phone use | | Reference group 32: | never regular use | | group 33: | ipsilateral use, time since start of use: 1-1.9 years | | group 34: | ipsilateral use, time since start of use: 2-4 years | | group 35: | ipsilateral use, time since start of use: 5-9 years | | group 36: | ipsilateral use, time since start of use: ≥ 10 years | | Reference group 37: | no regular use | | group 38: | ipsilateral use, cumulative call time: < 5 h | | group 39: | ipsilateral use, cumulative call time: 5-114.9 h | | group 40: | ipsilateral use, cumulative call time: 115-359.9 h | | group 41: | ipsilateral use, cumulative call time: 360-1639.9 h | | group 42: | ipsilateral use, cumulative call time: ≥ 1640 h | | Reference group 43: | no regular use | | group 44: | ipsilateral use, cumulative number of calls: 150 | | group 45: | ipsilateral use, cumulative number of calls: 150-2,549 | | group 46: | ipsilateral use, cumulative number of calls: 2,550-6,799 | | group 47: | ipsilateral use, cumulative number of calls: 6,800-26,999 | | group 48: | ipsilateral use, cumulative number of calls: ≥ 27,000 | | Reference group 49: | no regular use | | group 50: | contralateral use, time since start of use: 1-1.9 years | | group 51: | contralateral use, time since start of use: 2-4 years | | group 52: | contralateral use, time since start of use: 5-9 years | | group 53: | contralateral use, time since start of use: ≥ 10 years | | Reference group 54: | no regular use | | group 55: | contralateral use, cumulative call time: < 5 h | | group 56: | contralateral use, cumulative call time: 5-114.9 h | | group 57: | contralateral use, cumulative call time: 115-359.9 h | | group 58: | contralateral use, cumulative call time: 360-1639.9 h | | group 59: | contralateral use, cumulative call time: ≥ 1640 h | | Reference group 60: | no regular use | | group 61: | contralateral use, cumulative number of calls: 150 | | group 62: | contralateral use, cumulative number of calls: 150-2,549 | | group 63: | contralateral use, cumulative number of calls: 2,550-6,799 | | group 64: | contralateral use, cumulative number of calls: 6,800-26,999 | | group 65: | contralateral use, cumulative number of calls: ≥ 27,000 |
Population
- case group
men and women, aged from 30 to 59 years diagnosis: acoustic neuroma, histologically confirmed or based on unequivocal diagnostic imaging observation period: 2000 - 2004 study location: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and the UK source of data: neurological and neurosurgical facilities in the study regions
- control group
selection: population-based matching: sex, age, ethnic origin (only in Israel), 1:2 (case:control)
Further parameters acquired by questionnaire (socio-demographic factors, occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and ionizing radiation, exposure to loud noise, medical history (subject¿s and family), ionizing and non-ionizing medical radiation exposures, and smoking)
Study size  | cases | controls |
|---|
| number eligible | 1,361 | 14,354 | | number participating | 1,121 | 7658 | | number available for analysis | 1,105 | 2,145 |
Statistically significant results 
Statistical analysis using conditional logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex, education, study centre, ethnicity in Israel), sensitivity analyses Results/conclusion (according to author) Overall, no increased risk for acoustic neuroma was observed with ever having been a regular mobile phone user (group 2) and for persons with 10 years and longer mobile phone use (group 7). No trend of increasing ORs with increasing cumulative call time or cumulative number of calls was observed, with the lowest OR (0.48; CI 0.30-0.78) observed in the second highest group of cumulative call time (735 -1639.9 h). In the highest group (≥ 1640 h) of cumulative call time, the OR was 1.32 (CI 0.88-1.97); but there were implausible values reported in this group (e.g., mobile phone use more than 5 h/day). Similar results were observed when restricting the analysis at 5 years before the reference date (to exclude possible effects of prodomal symptoms on mobile phone use). In general, odds ratios were not greater in subjects who reported usual phone use on the same side of the head as their tumor (ipsilateral) than in persons with contralateral use, but it was greater in those with 1640 and more cumulative hours of use.
The authors concluded that there was no increase in risk of acoustic neuroma with ever regular use of a mobile phone or for users who began regular use 10 years or more before the reference date. Elevated odds ratios observed at the highest level of cumulative call time could be due to chance, reporting bias or a causal effect. As acoustic neuroma is usually a slowly growing tumour, the interval between introduction of mobile phones and occurrence of the tumor might have been too short to observe an effect, if there is one.
(Study character: epidemiological study, case-control study)
Study funded by - Academy of Finland
- Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), France
- Australian Research Council (ARC)
- Bouygues Telecom, France
- Canada Research Chairs (Chaires de Recherche du Canada), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA; Association canadienne des télécommunications sans fil (ACTS)), Canada
- Cancer Society of New Zealand
- Department of Health, UK
- Deutsches Mobilfunk Forschungsprogramm (DMF; German Mobile Phone Research Programme) at Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS)
- Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Finland
- European Union (EU)/European Commission
- GSM Association, UK/Ireland
- Guzzo Environment-Cancer Chair (University of Montréal) in partnership with Cancer Research Society (CRS) undertaken by the Environment-Cancer Fund, Canada
- Hawkes Bay Medical Research Foundation (HBMR), New Zealand
- Health and Safety Executive, UK
- Health Research Council of New Zealand
- International Union against Cancer (UICC; Union Internationale Contre le Cancer), Switzerland
- MAIFOR Program (Mainzer Forschungsförderungsprogramm) of the University of Mainz, Germany
- Ministerium für Umwelt und Naturschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Nordrhein-Westfalen (Ministry for the Environment of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany
- Ministerium für Umwelt und Verkehr, Baden-Württemberg (Ministry for the Environment and Traffic of the state of Baden-Württemberg), Germany
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan
- Mobile Manufacturers Forum (MMF), Belgium
- Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR), UK
- Orange
- O2
- Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources program of European Union
- Scottish Executive/Scottish Ministers, UK
- SFR, France
- Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden)
- Swedish Research Council (VR)
- T-Mobile
- Vodafone
- Waikato Medical Research Foundation (WMRF), New Zealand
- Wellington Medical Research Foundation (WMRF), New Zealand
- 3
Related articles 
- Little MP et al. (2012): Mobile phone use and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results...
- Schüz J et al. (2011): Long-Term Mobile Phone Use and the Risk of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Danish...
- Sato Y et al. (2011): A case-case study of mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma risk in Japan.
- Frei P et al. (2011): Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study.
- INTERPHONE Study Group et al. (2010): Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the...
- Kan P et al. (2008): Cellular phone use and brain tumor: a meta-analysis.
- Cardis E et al. (2007): The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the...
- Schlehofer B et al. (2007): Environmental risk factors for sporadic acoustic neuroma (Interphone Study...
- Takebayashi T et al. (2006): Mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma risk in Japan.
- Schüz J et al. (2006): Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort.
- Hardell L et al. (2005): Case-Control Study on Cellular and Cordless Telephones and the Risk for...
- Schoemaker MJ et al. (2005): Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the Interphone...
- Lönn S et al. (2004): Mobile Phone Use and the Risk of Acoustic Neuroma.
- Christensen HC et al. (2004): Cellular telephone use and risk of acoustic neuroma.
- Muscat JE et al. (2002): Handheld cellular telephones and risk of acoustic neuroma.
- Johansen C et al. (2001): Cellular telephones and cancer--a nationwide cohort study in Denmark.
- Cardis E et al. (1999): International Case-Control Study of Adult Brain, Head and Neck Tumours: Results...
 |
 |
Glossary: acoustic neuroma, bias, brain tumor, case-control study, CI, conditional logistic regression, contralateral, cumulative, diagnosis, diagnostic imaging, electromagnetic fields, emitted, endpoint, epidemiological, exposure, frequency, glioma, histologically, incidence, initiated, Interphone, ionizing, ionizing radiation, ipsilateral, laterality, matching, medical history, meningioma, mobile phone, neurological, noise, occupational exposure, OR, parotid gland tumor, population-based, potential, questionnaire, radiation, radiofrequency, risk, sensitivity, statistical, subjects, symptoms, tissues, trend, tumor |
 |